A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.
In Michigan, a directed verdict is a ruling by the court during a jury trial, typically requested by a defendant, where the judge determines that the plaintiff (the party with the burden of proof) has not presented legally sufficient evidence to support a claim, and therefore, no reasonable jury could find in favor of the plaintiff on that claim. This procedure is governed by Michigan Court Rules, specifically MCR 2.515. The rule allows a party to move for a directed verdict at the close of the evidence presented by an opponent. If the court grants a directed verdict, the case (or the specific claim) is decided without sending it to the jury for deliberation. This is distinct from a summary judgment, which is decided before a trial begins and is based on the court finding that there is no genuine issue of material fact for a jury to decide. Both mechanisms serve to expedite the resolution of legal disputes when the evidence is insufficient to support a party's case.