Select your state

Civil procedure

directed verdict

A directed verdict is a procedure used by judges during trial to dismiss one or more claims when the party with the burden of proof (plaintiff) has failed to introduce evidence that is sufficient for a reasonable jury to find in favor of the party with the burden of proof. A directed verdict is like a summary judgment, but happens during trial rather than before trial.

In Kentucky, a directed verdict is a ruling by the court during a jury trial, typically requested by the defense, where the judge determines that the plaintiff (or party with the burden of proof) has not presented sufficient evidence to allow a reasonable jury to find in their favor. This procedural move occurs after the plaintiff has presented their case but before the case is sent to the jury for deliberation. Kentucky Rules of Civil Procedure (CR) 50.01 outlines the process for requesting a directed verdict. If the judge grants a directed verdict, it means that the judge concludes the evidence is so strongly against the plaintiff that no reasonable jury could find in their favor, effectively ending that part of the case without it going to the jury. This is distinct from a summary judgment, which is decided before a trial begins and is based on the argument that there are no material facts in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

Legal Articles

State Statutes

Individual & Family Legal Plan

As a LegalFix member, you'll get expert legal services from a local law firm that treats you like an important client. Don't wait—be prepared for life's inevitable legal challenges starting today. And ask your employer, credit union, or membership group about preferred pricing opportunities.

Civil procedure

directed verdict

Individual & Family Legal Plan

Articles

Kentucky State Code

Kentucky State Code

Civil procedure

directed verdict

Articles