Before or after a person’s arrest for a DUI/DWI criminal offense, police officers may ask the accused/defendant to submit to a breath test for alcohol concentration to determine whether the person is per se intoxicated. Per se intoxication is intoxication by definition—as defined in the state’s statutes, which is often a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of .08 or higher (.05 in Utah). A breath test measures the amount of alcohol in the air a person exhales and uses that amount to estimate how much alcohol is in the person’s blood (BAC).

There are two types of breath tests: (1) a portable breath test (PBT) that is typically given in the field (at the side of the road or other place where a driver has been detained); and (2) the Intoxilyzer or DataMaster breathalyzer machine that is usually located at the police station. The results of a PBT are generally not admissible at trial but may be the basis for probable cause for the police officer to arrest a driver when the test shows a BAC of .08 or higher in most states (.05 in Utah). And the results of an Intoxilyzer test generally are admissible at trial.

All states have implied consent laws that make a driver’s consent or agreement to submit to a blood, breath, or urine test (a chemical test) when requested by a law enforcement officer a condition of the driver’s acceptance of a driver’s license offered by the state. Despite implied consent laws, in 2013 the United States Supreme Court held that if a person refuses to submit to having their blood drawn the police cannot draw the blood by force without a search warrant, as required under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. But more recently the Supreme Court upheld a nonconsensual blood draw of an unconscious person suspected of driving under the influence—based on the state’s implied consent laws and the exigent circumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.

And if a driver refuses to take a breath or blood test there are other consequences even if the police do not secure a search warrant for a blood draw—including fines, penalties, and automatic suspension of the driver’s license for a year or more.

In Ohio, the legal limit for blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is .08 for drivers 21 years and older, and a lower limit applies for commercial drivers and drivers under 21. When a person is arrested for a DUI (Driving Under the Influence) or OVI (Operating a Vehicle under the Influence) offense, law enforcement may request the individual to submit to a breath test to determine BAC levels. There are two types of breath tests used in Ohio: the portable breath test (PBT) and the more sophisticated devices like the Intoxilyzer, typically located at police stations. PBT results are generally used to establish probable cause for arrest and are not typically admissible in court, whereas Intoxilyzer results may be used as evidence at trial. Ohio's implied consent law requires drivers to submit to chemical tests if requested by a law enforcement officer as a condition of holding a driver's license. Refusal to submit to a breath or blood test can result in penalties such as fines, mandatory driver intervention programs, and automatic license suspension under Ohio law. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that forced blood draws without a warrant are unconstitutional unless exigent circumstances exist, but implied consent laws may allow nonconsensual blood draws in certain situations, such as when a suspect is unconscious.