In a jury trial, after the parties introduce all of their evidence and the jury charge (instructions) is read to the jury, the parties may argue the case to the jury. The party with the burden of proof on the whole case—or on all matters that are submitted by the jury charge—will generally be allowed to open and conclude the argument. And where there are several parties with separate claims or defenses, the court will determine the order in which they are allowed to argue the case to the jury.
In Georgia, during a jury trial, after all evidence has been presented and the jury has received instructions (jury charge) from the judge, the parties have the opportunity to make their closing arguments. The party that carries the burden of proof, meaning the party responsible for proving the allegations made, is typically granted the right to both open and conclude the argument. This is often the plaintiff in a civil case or the prosecution in a criminal case. When multiple parties are involved, each with their own claims or defenses, the order of arguments is determined by the court. The purpose of these arguments is to persuade the jury to interpret the evidence in a way that favors their position. The court's decision on the order of arguments takes into account fairness and the logical flow of the case, ensuring that the jury can follow the arguments and understand each party's perspective.