Section 26-13-304 - Discretionary Clause Prohibited.

WY Stat § 26-13-304 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

26-13-304. Discretionary clause prohibited.

(a) No policy, contract, certificate or agreement offered or issued in this state by a health carrier to provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for or reimburse any of the costs of health care services may contain a provision purporting to reserve discretion to the health carrier to interpret the terms of the contract, or to provide standards of interpretation or review that are inconsistent with the laws of this state. This subsection shall not apply to a policy, contract, certificate or agreement subject to and meeting the requirements of subsections (b) and (c) of this section.

(b) Any group policy, contract, certificate or agreement subject to the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act and offered or issued in this state by a health carrier to provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for or reimburse any of the costs of health care services and which contains a provision purporting to reserve discretion to the health carrier to interpret the terms of the contract or to provide standards of interpretation or review shall contain the following language highlighted in bold in not less than twelve (12) point type:

This benefit plan contains a discretionary clause. Determinations made by (insurer name) pursuant to the discretionary clause do not prohibit or prevent a claimant from seeking judicial review in court of (insurer name's) decisions. By including this discretionary clause (insurer's name) agrees to allow a court to review its determinations anew when a claimant seeks judicial review of (insurer name's) determinations of eligibility of benefits, the payment of benefits or interpretations of the terms and conditions applicable to the benefit plan.

(c) Any group policy, contract, certificate or agreement containing a discretionary clause as authorized in subsection (b) of this section shall contain a provision entitling any person denied benefits in whole or in part to have the determination reviewed de novo in any court with jurisdiction.