Section 507 - Components of educator evaluation program.

UT Code § 53G-11-507 (2019) (N/A)
Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

(1) A local school board in consultation with a joint committee established in Section 53G-11-506 shall adopt a reliable and valid educator evaluation program that evaluates educators based on educator professional standards established by the state board and includes: (a) a systematic annual evaluation of all provisional, probationary, and career educators; (b) use of multiple lines of evidence, including: (i) self-evaluation; (ii) student and parent input; (iii) for an administrator, employee input; (iv) a reasonable number of supervisor observations to ensure adequate reliability; (v) evidence of professional growth and other indicators of instructional improvement based on educator professional standards established by the state board; and (vi) student academic growth data; (c) a summative evaluation that differentiates among four levels of performance; and (d) for an administrator, the effectiveness of evaluating employee performance in a school or school district for which the administrator has responsibility.

(a) a systematic annual evaluation of all provisional, probationary, and career educators;

(b) use of multiple lines of evidence, including: (i) self-evaluation; (ii) student and parent input; (iii) for an administrator, employee input; (iv) a reasonable number of supervisor observations to ensure adequate reliability; (v) evidence of professional growth and other indicators of instructional improvement based on educator professional standards established by the state board; and (vi) student academic growth data;

(i) self-evaluation;

(ii) student and parent input;

(iii) for an administrator, employee input;

(iv) a reasonable number of supervisor observations to ensure adequate reliability;

(v) evidence of professional growth and other indicators of instructional improvement based on educator professional standards established by the state board; and

(vi) student academic growth data;

(c) a summative evaluation that differentiates among four levels of performance; and

(d) for an administrator, the effectiveness of evaluating employee performance in a school or school district for which the administrator has responsibility.

(2) (a) An educator evaluation program described in Subsection (1) may include a reasonable number of peer observations. (b) An educator evaluation program described in Subsection (1) may not use end-of-level assessment scores in educator evaluation.

(a) An educator evaluation program described in Subsection (1) may include a reasonable number of peer observations.

(b) An educator evaluation program described in Subsection (1) may not use end-of-level assessment scores in educator evaluation.