(a) After May 12, 1988, any private act that authorizes a city or county to levy a tax on the privilege of occupancy of a hotel shall limit the application of such tax as follows:

(1) A city shall only levy such tax on occupancy of hotels located within its municipal boundaries;

(2) A city shall not be authorized to levy such tax on occupancy of hotels if the county in which such city is located has levied such tax prior to the adoption of the tax by the city; and

(3) A county shall only levy such tax on occupancy of hotels located within its boundaries but outside the boundaries of any municipality that has levied a tax on such occupancy prior to the adoption of such tax by the county.

(b) This section shall be applied prospectively only and all private acts levying taxes on the privilege of occupancy of hotels enacted prior to May 12, 1988, shall remain in full force and effect. For the purposes of this section, “enacted” means passed by both houses of the general assembly and signed by the governor and approved in accordance with the Constitution of Tennessee, article XI, § 9.

(c) This section does not apply in any county, excluding any county with a metropolitan form of government, that:

(1) Contains or borders a county that contains an airport designated as a regular commercial service airport in the international civil aviation organization (ICAO) regional air navigation plan; and

(2) Contains a government-owned convention center of at least fifty thousand square feet (50,000 sq. ft.) with an attached, adjoining, or adjacent hotel or motel facility; or

(3) Contains an airport with regularly scheduled commercial passenger service, and the creating municipality of the metropolitan airport authority for the airport is not located within such county. The tax levied on occupancy of hotels by cities located within such a county may only be used for tourism as defined by § 7-4-101;

(d) This section shall not apply in any county having a population of not less than eighty thousand (80,000) nor more than eighty-three thousand (83,000), in any county having a population of not less than thirty-five thousand fifty (35,050) nor more than thirty-five thousand seventy (35,070), nor in any county having a population of not less than one hundred eighteen thousand four hundred (118,400) nor more than one hundred eighteen thousand seven hundred (118,700), according to the 1990 federal census or any subsequent federal census.

(e) This section does not apply to any city that has constructed a qualifying project or projects under the Convention Center and Tourism Development Financing Act of 1998, compiled in title 7, chapter 88. Further, § 67-4-503 shall not be applicable to such cities as it relates to the authority to levy an occupancy tax.

(f) This section shall not apply in any county having a population of not less than twenty-five thousand five hundred seventy-five (25,575) nor more than twenty-five thousand eight hundred fifty (25,850), according to the 2000 federal census or any subsequent federal census.

(g) This section shall not apply in any municipality that is located within the boundaries of all of the following three (3) counties: a county having a population of not less than seventy-one thousand three hundred (71,300) nor more than seventy-one thousand four hundred (71,400), a county having a population of not less than nineteen thousand five hundred (19,500) nor more than nineteen thousand seven hundred seventy-five (19,775), and a county having a population of not less than fifty-one thousand nine hundred (51,900) nor more than fifty-two thousand (52,000), all according to the 2000 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the municipality is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the municipality of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(h) This section shall not apply in any municipality having a population of not less than five thousand two hundred (5,200) nor more than five thousand three hundred (5,300), according to the 2000 federal census or any subsequent federal census, that is located within a county having a population of not less than fifty-one thousand nine hundred (51,900) nor more than fifty-two thousand (52,000), according to the 2000 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the municipality is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the municipality of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(i) This section shall not apply in any municipality having a population of not less than seven thousand three hundred fifty (7,350) nor more than seven thousand four hundred and ten (7,410), according to the 2000 federal census of population or any subsequent federal census located within a county having a population of not less than twenty-five thousand four hundred and fifty (24,450) nor more than twenty-five thousand five hundred and fifty (25,550), according to the 2000 federal census of population or any subsequent federal census. Any such municipality shall be authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the municipality of each transient in an amount of the consideration charged by the operator as set by ordinance of the governing body. All proceeds received by the municipality from such tax shall be dedicated solely for tourism development. The ordinance shall further set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(j) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than six thousand nine hundred (6,900) nor more than seven thousand (7,000), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census, that is located within a county having a population of not less than thirty-five thousand six hundred (35,600) nor more than thirty-five thousand seven hundred (35,700), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from such tax shall be dedicated solely for tourism development. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(k) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than thirty-four thousand six hundred (34,600) nor more than thirty-four thousand seven hundred (34,700), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census, that is located within any county having a population of not less than eighty thousand nine hundred (80,900) nor more than eighty-one thousand (81,000), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized, after notice and a public hearing, to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The public shall have not less than thirty (30) days to comment on the levying of the tax after receiving notice from the city and before the public hearing. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be dedicated solely for tourism development in Maury County. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(l) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than six thousand eight hundred twenty (6,820) nor more than six thousand eight hundred thirty (6,830), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census, that is located within any county having a population of not less than thirty-three thousand three hundred (33,300) nor more than thirty-three thousand four hundred (33,400), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized, after notice and public hearing, to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The public shall have not less than thirty (30) days to comment on the levying of the tax after receiving notice from the city and before the public hearing. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used for tourism development purposes. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(m) This section shall not apply in any county having a population of not less than thirteen thousand seven hundred (13,700) nor more than thirteen thousand seven hundred fifty (13,750), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the county is authorized to levy a privilege tax by resolution adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The resolution shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(n) Notwithstanding this part to the contrary, by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its legislative body, any municipality having a population of not less than sixty-three thousand (63,000) nor more than sixty-three thousand five hundred (63,500), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census, is authorized to adjust the rate of the municipality's privilege tax upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the municipality of each transient; provided, however, any adjustment shall be made one (1) time only and shall not exceed two percent (2%) of the consideration charged to the transient by the operator. Any proceeds received by the municipality from any adjustment in the rate shall be used solely for tourism.

(o) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than twenty-nine thousand thirty (29,030) nor more than twenty-nine thousand forty (29,040), which is located within any county having a population of not less than one hundred eighty-three thousand one hundred (183,100) nor more than one hundred eighty-three thousand two hundred (183,200), or which is located within any county having a population of not less than eighty thousand nine hundred (80,900) nor more than eighty-one thousand (81,000), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed three percent (3%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The proceeds from such tax shall be deposited in a special revenue fund, separate from the general fund, and used solely for tourism development purposes. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(p) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than two thousand eight hundred (2,800) nor more than three thousand (3,000) that is located within any county having a population of not less than fifty-one thousand four hundred (51,400) nor more than fifty-one thousand five hundred (51,500), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two percent (2%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely to promote tourism in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(q) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than six thousand four hundred forty (6,440) nor more than six thousand four hundred forty-nine (6,449), located within two counties, one of which having a population of not less than sixty-six thousand two hundred (66,200) nor more than sixty-six thousand three hundred (66,300) and the other having a population of not less than one hundred sixty thousand six hundred (160,600) nor more than one hundred sixty thousand seven hundred (160,700), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized, after notice and public hearing, to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely for tourism development purposes. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(r) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than thirteen thousand six hundred (13,600) nor more than thirteen thousand six hundred nine (13,609), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census, that is located within any county having a population of not less than thirty-nine thousand eight hundred (39,800) nor more than thirty-nine thousand nine hundred (39,900), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely for tourism development purposes. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(s) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than two thousand seven hundred fifty (2,750) nor more than two thousand seven hundred fifty-nine (2,759) that is located within any county having a population of not less than thirty-nine thousand one hundred (39,100) nor more than thirty-nine thousand two hundred (39,200), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(t) This section shall not apply in any city that is situated in two (2) or more counties and having a population of not less than eleven thousand four hundred eighty (11,480) nor more than eleven thousand four hundred eighty-nine (11,489), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from such tax shall be dedicated solely for tourism development. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(u) This section does not apply in any city that is situated in two (2) or more counties and having a population of not less than twenty thousand six hundred (20,600) nor more than twenty thousand seven hundred (20,700), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed four percent (4%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax must be used solely for tourism development. The ordinance must set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(v) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than four thousand one hundred forty (4,140) nor more than four thousand one hundred forty-nine (4,149) that is located within any county having a population of not less than thirty-nine thousand one hundred (39,100) nor more than thirty-nine thousand two hundred (39,200), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(w) This section does not apply to any city having a population of not less than fifty-one thousand (51,000) nor more than fifty-two thousand (52,000), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census, located in a county with a population of not less than one hundred sixty thousand six hundred (160,600) nor more than one hundred sixty thousand seven hundred (160,700), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent census; provided, that the city may, after notice and a public hearing, levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two and three-fourths percent (2.75%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax must be used solely for tourism development purposes. The ordinance must set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(x) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than thirty thousand (30,000) nor more than thirty thousand five hundred (30,500) that is located in a county having a population of not less than one hundred sixty thousand six hundred (160,600) nor more than one hundred sixty thousand seven hundred (160,700), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed five percent (5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from such tax shall be dedicated solely for tourism development. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(y) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than ten thousand seven hundred (10,700) nor more than ten thousand eight hundred (10,800) that is located within any county having a population of not less than fifty-six thousand (56,000) nor more than fifty-six thousand one hundred (56,100), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two percent (2%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(z) This section does not apply in any county having a population of not less than fifty-two thousand seven hundred (52,700) nor more than fifty-two thousand eight hundred (52,800), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the county is authorized to levy a privilege tax by resolution adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel or motel of each transient in an amount not to exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. The revenue generated by this privilege tax must be used to support local tourism and economic development. The resolution must set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(aa) This section does not apply in any city having a population of not less than six thousand ninety (6,090) nor more than six thousand one hundred (6,100) that is located within any county having a population of not less than eighteen thousand three hundred one (18,301) nor more than eighteen thousand four hundred (18,400), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (⅔) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed two and a half percent (2.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax must be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance must set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(bb) This section does not apply in any city having a population of not less than four thousand five hundred forty (4,540) nor more than four thousand five hundred forty-nine (4,549) that is located within any county having a population of not less than thirty-nine thousand one hundred (39,100) nor more than thirty-nine thousand two hundred (39,200), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city on each transient in an amount not to exceed two and one-half percent (2.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax must be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance must set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(cc) This section does not apply in any city having a population of not less than thirty thousand four hundred thirty (30,430) nor more than thirty thousand four hundred thirty-nine (30,439) that is located within any county having a population of not less than seventy-two thousand three hundred (72,300) and not more than seventy-two thousand four hundred (72,400), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city on each transient in an amount not to exceed three percent (3%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax must be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance must set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.

(dd) This section shall not apply in any city having a population of not less than two thousand one hundred ninety (2,190) nor more than two thousand one hundred ninety-nine (2,199) that is located inside a county having a population of not less than fifty-one thousand four hundred (51,400) nor more than fifty-one thousand five hundred (51,500), according to the 2010 federal census or any subsequent federal census; provided, that the city is authorized to levy a privilege tax by ordinance adopted by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of its governing body upon the privilege of occupancy in any hotel located within the city of each transient in an amount not to exceed three and one-half percent (3.5%) of the consideration charged by the operator. All proceeds received by the city from the tax shall be used solely to promote tourism and economic development in the city and for no other purpose. The ordinance shall set forth the manner of collection and administration of the privilege tax.