A. No trust office of an out-of-state trust institution may be acquired or established in this state pursuant to Sections 15 through 20 of this act unless:
1. The out-of-state trust institution shall have confirmed in writing to the Commissioner that for as long as it maintains a trust office in this state, it will comply with all applicable laws of this state;
2. The notificant shall have provided satisfactory evidence to the Commissioner of compliance with:
a.any applicable requirements of state foreign corporation qualification laws, and
b.the applicable requirements of its home state regulator for acquiring or establishing and maintaining such office; and
3. The Commissioner, acting within sixty (60) days after receiving notice under Section 18 of this act, shall have certified to the home state regulator that the requirements of Sections 15 through 20 of this act have been met and the notice has been approved or, if applicable, that any conditions imposed by the Commissioner pursuant to subsection B of this section have been satisfied.
B. The out-of-state trust institution may commence business at the trust office on the sixty-first day after the date the Commissioner receives the notice unless the Commissioner specifies an earlier or later date. However, with respect to an out-of-state trust institution that is not a depository institution and for which the Commissioner shall have conditioned such approval on the satisfaction by the notificant of any requirement applicable to a state trust company, such institution shall have satisfied such conditions and provided to the Commissioner satisfactory evidence thereof.
C. The sixty-day period of review may be extended by the Commissioner on a determination that the written notice raises issues that require additional information or additional time for analysis. If the period of review is extended, the out-of-state trust institution may establish the office only on prior written approval by the Commissioner.
D. The Commissioner may deny approval of the office if the Commissioner finds that the notificant lacks sufficient financial resources to undertake the proposed expansion without adversely affecting its safety or soundness or that the proposed office is contrary to the public interest. In acting on the notice, the Commissioner shall consider the views of the appropriate bank supervisory agencies.
Added by Laws 1998, c. 104, § 19, eff. Nov. 1, 1998.