(a) Such person and any firm, partnership or corporation of which he is a member, partner, director or officer, shall be disqualified from thereafter selling to or submitting bids to or receiving awards from or entering into any contracts with the Utica transit authority or official thereof or any subcontract thereunder, or sub-contracting with any person, firm, partnership or corporation who or which has entered into any such contract or contracts, in relation to such contract or contracts, for goods, work or services, for a period of five years after such refusal. No person, firm, partnership or corporation who or which has entered into any contract or contracts with the state, or any political subdivision thereof, a public authority, a mass transportation authority, or with any public department, agency or official of the state or any political subdivision thereof or of any public authority, or of a mass transportation authority, for goods, work or services, shall enter into a subcontract thereon with any person, firm or corporation which is disqualified to contract as provided herein. Such clause shall also provide that

(b) Any and all contracts made with the Utica transit authority or official thereof or any subcontract thereunder, since the effective date of this law, by such person and by any firm, partnership or corporation of which he is a member, partner, director or officer may be cancelled or terminated by the Utica transit authority without incurring any penalty or damages on account of such cancellation or termination, but any moneys owing by the Utica transit authority or by a contractor or subcontractor thereunder for goods delivered or work done prior to the cancellation or termination shall be paid. 3. (a) Any person who, when called before a grand jury to testify concerning any transaction or contract had with the state, any political subdivision thereof, a public authority, a mass transportation authority or with a public department, agency or official of the state or of any political subdivision thereof or of a public authority or of a mass transportation authority, refuses to sign a waiver of immunity against subsequent criminal prosecution or to answer any relevant question concerning such transaction or contract, and any firm, partnership or corporation of which he is a member, partner, director or officer shall be disqualified from thereafter selling to or submitting bids to or receiving awards from or entering into any contracts with any mass transportation authority or any official of any mass transportation authority created by the state or any political subdivision, or sub-contracting with any person, firm, partnership or corporation who or which has entered into any such contract or contracts, in relation to such contract or contracts, for goods, work or services, for a period of five years after such refusal or until a disqualification shall be removed pursuant to the applicable provisions of law. No person, firm, partnership or corporation who or which has entered into any contract or contracts with the state, or any political subdivision thereof, a public authority, a mass transportation authority, or with any public department, agency or official of the state or any political subdivision thereof or of any public authority, or of a mass transportation authority, for goods, work or services, shall enter into a subcontract thereon with any person, firm or corporation which is disqualified to contract as provided herein.

(b) It shall be the duty of the officer conducting the investigation before the grand jury before which the refusal occurs to send notice of such refusal, together with the names of any firm, partnership or corporation of which the person so refusing is known to be a member, partner, officer or director, to the commissioner of transportation of the state of New York and the appropriate departments, agencies and officials of the state, political subdivisions thereof or public authorities with whom the person so refusing and any firm, partnership or corporation of which he is a member, partner, director or officer, is known to have a contract. 4. (a) Any firm, partnership or corporation which has become subject to the cancellation or termination of a contract or subcontract or disqualification to contract or subcontract on account of the refusal of a member, partner, director or officer thereof to waive immunity when called to testify, as provided in subdivisions two and three of this section, may, upon ten days' notice to the attorney general and to the officer who conducted the investigation before the grand jury in which the refusal occurred, make an application at a special term of the supreme court held within the judicial district in which the refusal occurred for an order discontinuing the disqualification. Such application shall be in the form of a petition setting forth grounds, including that the cooperation by petitioner with the grand jury at the time of the refusal was such, and the amount and degree of control and financial interest, if any, in the petitioning firm, partnership or corporation by the member, partner, officer or director who refused to waive immunity is such that it will not be in the public interest to cancel or terminate petitioner's contracts or subcontracts or to continue the disqualification, as provided in subdivisions two and three of this section. A copy of the petition and accompanying papers shall be served with the notices to be given pursuant to this subdivision.

(b) Upon the filing of such petition the court may stay as to petitioner, pending a decision upon the petition, the cancellation or termination of any contracts or subcontracts resulting from such refusal upon such terms as to notice or otherwise as may be just.

(c) At least two days prior to the return day, the officer who conducted the investigation before the grand jury and the attorney general may file answers to the petition or apply for an order dismissing the petition as a matter of law. On or before the return day the petitioner may file a reply to the answer.

(d) Upon the return day the court may, upon the petition and answer and other papers filed, forthwith render such final order as the case requires, or if a triable issue of fact is duly raised, it shall forthwith be tried before a court sitting without a jury or before a referee. The provisions of statute or rule governing references in an action shall apply to a reference under this subdivision.

(e) The court shall render a final order dismissing the petition on the merits or discontinuing the disqualification upon the ground that the public interest would be served by its discontinuance, and granting such other relief as to the cancellation or termination of contracts or subcontracts as may be appropriate, but without costs to petitioner. 5. (a) Every bid or proposal hereafter made to a mass transportation authority where competitive bidding is required by statute, rule or regulation, for work or services performed or to be performed or goods sold or to be sold shall contain the following statement subscribed by the bidder and affirmed by such bidder as true under the penalties of perjury: Non-collusive bidding certification.

(1) By submission of this bid, each bidder and each person signing on behalf of any bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as to its own organization, under penalty of perjury, that to the best of his knowledge and belief:

(i) The prices in this bid have been arrived at independently without collusion, consultation, communication, or agreement, for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other bidder or with any competitor;

(ii) Unless otherwise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the bidder and will not knowingly be disclosed by the bidder prior to opening, directly or indirectly, to any other bidder or to any competitor; and

(iii) No attempt has been made or will be made by the bidder to induce any other person, partnership or corporation to submit or not to submit a bid for the purpose of restricting competition.

(2) A bid shall not be considered for award nor shall any award be made where (1) (i) (ii) and (iii) above have not been complied with; provided however, that if in any case the bidder cannot make the foregoing certification, the bidder shall so state and shall furnish with the bid a signed statement which sets forth in detail the reasons therefor. Where (1) (i) (ii) and (iii) above have not been complied with, the bid shall not be considered for award nor shall any award be made unless the Utica transit authority to which the bid is made determines that such disclosure was not made for the purpose of restricting competition. The fact that a bidder (a) has published price lists, rates, or tariffs covering items being procured, (b) has informed prospective customers of proposed or pending publication of new or revised price lists for such items, or (c) has sold the same items to other customers at the same prices being bid, does not constitute, without more, a disclosure within the meaning of paragraph (a) of this subdivision.

(b) Any bid hereafter made to the Utica transit authority by a corporate bidder for work or services performed or to be performed or goods sold or to be sold, where competitive bidding is required by statute, rule, regulation, or local law, and where such bid contains the certification referred to in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, shall be deemed to have been authorized by the board of directors of the bidder, and such authorization shall be deemed to include the signing and submission of the bid and the inclusion therein of the certificate as to non-collusion as the act and deed of the corporation.