A. A state agency shall not enter into a contract for services, construction or items of tangible personal property with a legislator, the legislator's family or with a business in which the legislator or the legislator's family has a substantial interest unless the legislator has disclosed the legislator's substantial interest and unless the contract is awarded in accordance with the provisions of the Procurement Code [13-1-28 to 13-1-199 NMSA 1978], except the potential contractor shall not be eligible for a sole source or small purchase contract. A person negotiating or executing a contract on behalf of a state agency shall exercise due diligence to ensure compliance with the provisions of this subsection.

B. A legislator shall not appear for, represent or assist another person in a matter before a state agency, unless without compensation or for the benefit of a constituent, except for legislators who are attorneys or other professional persons engaged in the conduct of their professions and, in those instances, the legislator shall refrain from references to the legislator's legislative capacity except as to matters of scheduling, from communications on legislative stationery and from threats or implications relating to legislative actions.

History: 1953 Comp., § 5-12-9, enacted by Laws 1967, ch. 306, § 9; 1989, ch. 143, § 1; 1993, ch. 46, § 33; 2007, ch. 362, § 6.

The 2007 amendment, effective July 1, 2007, prohibited contracts with a legislator's family or a business in which the legislator's family has a substantial interest; provided that legislators and their families are not eligible for sole source or small purchase contracts; and required persons who negotiate contracts for a state agency to use due diligence to ensure compliance with this section.

The 1993 amendment, effective July 1, 1993, inserted "Representation Before State Agencies" in the section heading; designated the undesignated provisions as Subsection A and added Subsection B; and, in Subsection A, substituted the language beginning "has a substantial interest" for "has controlling interest in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000) where the legislator has disclosed his controlling interest unless the contract is made after public notice and competitive sealed bidding or competitive sealed proposal in accordance with the provisions of the Procurement Code."

School districts are "state agencies" covered by the Conflict of Interest Act [now Governmental Conduct Act]. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 89-34.

Contracts with nonprofit organizations. — The Conflict of Interest Act [now Governmental Conduct Act] does not disqualify or restrict a nonprofit organization's ability to enter into contracts with state agencies managed by a board of directors having as one of its members a state legislator. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-17.

Contracts with nonprofit organizations. — New Mexico Const., art. IV, § 28 precludes a nonprofit organization from entering into a contract with the state or a state agency if the organization, within one year of entering the contract, had as a director a member of the legislature and the contract was authorized during that member's term. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-17.

Legislator is subject to restrictions when he sells products. — A legislator can sell products to a state agency on an open account or collect-on-delivery basis only under contracts of less than $1,000.00. In addition, a legislator would remain subject to N.M. Const., art. IV, § 28, so that he could not make any sales during his term or one year afterwards if the sales were authorized by law during his term. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 89-34.

Legislator may bid on state contracts, if there was public notice of the bid and the bidding was competitive. 1967 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 67-133.

Company owned by legislator may bid on state contracts. — Unless otherwise prohibited by N.M. Const., art. IV, § 28, a company owned by a legislator may bid on contracts to supply state agencies with materials and supplies under the competitive bid process set forth in the Procurement Code. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 89-34.

A legislator's company can bid as general contractor on state construction projects only if the project was not authorized during, or within one year of, his service in the legislature. If the contract on which the legislator's company bids is one authorized by statutes enacted more than one year before his service in the legislature and is worth more than $1,000, then he must give public notice of his bid, and the state agency must comply with the special procedures contained in the Conflict of Interest Act [now Governmental Conduct Act]. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 89-34.

When business owned by legislator acts as subcontractor. — If a business owned by a legislator bids on a contract with the state as a subcontractor and is a party to the contract, then the business is subject to the same limitations that apply when it acts as general contractor. If, however, the business only contracts with the general contractor and does not enter into any contract with the state, then the restrictions of this section no longer control. However, even though a subcontractor may not be subject to the Conflict of Interest Act [now Governmental Conduct Act], it still may be indirectly interested in a state contract and subject to the prohibition contained in N.M. Const., art. IV, § 28. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 89-34.

State legislator as employee of private contractor. — A private entity, either for-profit or nonprofit, that has a state legislator within its organization may enter into a contract with the state provided that the contracting process is conducted in accordance with constitutional and statutory requirements. 2003 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 03-01.

A legislator who complies with legislative rules is entitled to receive his legislative per diem. His private sector employer is free to determine whether it should also compensate him for that day's work. 2003 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 03-01.

Public defenders. — New Mexico Const., art. IV, § 28 would prohibit contract between public defender department and legislator if the legislator was in office in 1968 when the original Indigent Defense Act was passed, regardless of whether public notice and competitive bidding are used. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-23.

Public defenders. — The public defender's office may not award state representatives professional service contracts unless solicitation for competitive bids is done, in accordance with the Procurement Code. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 87-67.

Legislator is not prevented from serving as member of peanut commission by this section. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-34.

Conflict of interest is not affected if bond proceeds involved. — Any potential conflict of interest is not affected if a contract or project is funded with local bond proceeds rather than state money. 1989 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 89-34.

Damages. — A legislator and other directors of a nonprofit organization may be found liable for damages for breach of fiduciary duty if they intentionally enter into a contract which is invalid under N.M. Const., art. IV, § 28. 1990 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 90-17.

Propriety of vote or abstention. — A legislator should follow Chapter 10, Article 16 NMSA 1978 and his legislative body's code of ethics in deciding when it is proper to vote or abstain on a matter in front of the body. 2003 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 03-01.