LegalFix
Sign In

Form 9. COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE WHERE PLAINTIFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINE DEFINITELY WHETHER THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE IS C.D. OR E.F. OR WHETHER BOTH ARE RESPONSIBLE AND WHERE PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCE MAY JUSTIFY A FINDING OF WILLFULNESS OR OF RECKLESSNESS OR OF NEGLIGENCE

Copy with citation
Copy as parenthetical citation

Form 9. COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCEWHERE PLAINTIFF IS UNABLE TO DETERMINEDEFINITELY WHETHER THE PERSON RESPONSIBLEIS C.D. or E.F. OR WHETHER BOTH ARE RESPONSIBLEAND WHERE PLAINTIFF'S EVIDENCE MAY JUSTIFY A FINDINGOF WILLFULNESS OR OF RECKLESSNESS OR OF NEGLIGENCE

1. On June 1, 1959, in a public highway called State Street in Helena, Montana, defendant C.D. or defendant E.F., or both defendants C.D. and E.F. willfully or recklessly or negligently drove or caused to be driven a motor vehicle against the plaintiff who was then crossing said highway.

2. As a result plaintiff's leg was broken when thrown down and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting business, suffered great pain of body and mind, and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in an amount to be determined at trial.

Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against C.D. or against E.F. or against both in an amount to be determined at trial and costs.

History: En. Sec. 80, Ch. 13, L. 1961; amd. Sup. Ct. Ord. May 1, 1990, eff. May 1, 1990; amd. Sup. Ct. Ord. Mar. 26, 1993.

Previous Section
Form 8. COMPLAINT FOR NEGLIGENCE
Next Section
Form 10. COMPLAINT FOR CONVERSION