(a) The executive director of the Court Support Services Division shall be responsible for the supervision of the probation officers and other employees and may require reports from them. The executive director shall (1) formulate methods of investigation, supervision, record-keeping and reports, (2) compile statistics on the work of all probation officers, (3) maintain a record of all probationers, (4) perform such other duties as may be necessary to establish and maintain an efficient probation service in the Superior Court, and (5) prepare and publish such reports as may be required by the Chief Court Administrator. In the pursuance of such duties, the executive director shall have access to the records of probation officers.
(b) The Judicial Department shall establish within the Court Support Services Division an intensive probation program. The purpose of intensive probation is to place persons in the community under close supervision and restriction to ensure public safety, reduce prison overcrowding and contribute to the rehabilitation of persons in the program. There shall be periodic testing for drug or alcohol use for those probationers on intensive probation who have been identified as having histories of drug or alcohol abuse. Any defendant placed on intensive probation who fails to comply with the conditions of his intensive probation shall be presented to the court as provided in subsection (a) of section 53a-32 for a hearing to be conducted in accordance with said subsection. If such defendant is found by the court to have violated any condition of his intensive probation, the sentencing court or judge may continue such defendant on intensive probation, modify or enlarge the conditions of intensive probation or revoke the intensive probation and either require the defendant to serve the balance of the sentence imposed or impose any lesser sentence. The executive director of the Court Support Services Division shall have the same powers and duties with respect to the intensive probation program as the executive director has with respect to regular probation under subsection (a) of this section. Persons may be placed on intensive probation pursuant to an order of a court or judge under section 53a-30 or 53a-39a or as required by the Court Support Services Division.
(c) Subject to the approval of the Chief Court Administrator, the executive director of the Court Support Services Division may establish within the Court Support Services Division a community service program, including a community service labor program, which will assign, supervise and report compliance of persons sentenced to perform community service as a condition of probation or conditional discharge.
(d) The executive director of the Court Support Services Division shall establish within the Court Support Services Division a program wherein eighty-four probation officers shall have a caseload of not more than thirty-five probationers per officer for the purpose of providing high level supervision. This program shall be implemented with funds appropriated pursuant to section 48 of public act 90-213*, provided such caseload may be increased at the discretion of the executive director if funding for the current service level for the Court Support Services Division is reduced.
(1955, S. 3333d; P.A. 76-436, S. 555, 681; P.A. 77-614, S. 280, 610; P.A. 78-379, S. 23, 27; P.A. 79-585, S. 12, 15; P.A. 80-483, S. 137, 186; P.A. 84-505, S. 4, 6; P.A. 85-354, S. 2, 3; P.A. 87-538, S. 3, 5; P.A. 89-383, S. 5, 16; P.A. 90-213, S. 5, 14, 56; 90-261, S. 8, 19; P.A. 02-132, S. 44.)
*Note: Section 48 of public act 90-213 is special in nature and therefore has not been codified but remains in full force and effect according to its terms.
History: P.A. 76-436 revised section to reflect transfer of all trial jurisdiction to superior court, eliminating references to other courts, effective July 1, 1978; P.A. 77-614 replaced commission on adult probation with office of adult probation, eliminating limitations of director's powers requiring commission approval for various actions, specified that salaries are subject to compensation plan under Sec. 51-12, deleted director's duties to prescribe districts and assign probation officers to them and to conduct training courses for staff, and required publication of reports determined by chief court administrator rather than by commission or court, effective January 1, 1979; P.A. 78-379 added temporary provision re director's power to enter into contracts, effective July 1, 1978, through December 31, 1978; P.A. 79-585 authorized judges to take action re salaries through committee; P.A. 80-483 made technical grammatical correction; P.A. 84-505 added Subsec. (b) requiring the director of probation to establish an intensive probation program and specifying the purpose and nature of such program, effective June 13, 1984, to July 1, 1987; P.A. 85-354 amended Subsec. (b) to replace the requirement of “weekly” testing for drug and alcohol use with “periodic” testing and replace the requirement that the director of probation immediately inform the court of the failure of a probationer to comply with the rules, regulations and orders of the intensive probation program with provisions requiring any defendant who fails to comply with the conditions of his intensive probation to be presented to the court for a hearing and provisions specifying the options of the sentencing court or judge upon finding the defendant has violated any condition of his intensive probation; P.A. 87-538 reenacted and continued in effect on and after July 1, 1987, the provisions of this section previously effective from June 13, 1984, until July 1, 1987; P.A. 89-383 amended Subsec. (b) to delete from the stated purposes of intensive probation the removal of convicted persons from incarceration and added Subsec. (c) authorizing the director to establish a community service program, specifying the nature of the program and specifying the director's duties if he establishes such a program; P.A. 90-213 amended Subsec. (c) to authorize the establishment of a community service labor program and to require the director prior to the establishment of such program to certify that all anticipated costs can be paid for within available appropriations and added Subsec. (d) requiring the director to establish a program for the high level supervision of probationers by probation offices, providing for the funding of such program and authorizing an increase in the caseload if funding is reduced; P.A. 90-261 amended Subsec. (b) to delete the intensive probation caseload limit of twenty probationers per probation officer and the requirement that each week the officer have at least three contacts with each probationer and one or more collateral contacts, to delete the requirement that the director inform a court which ordered a sentenced defendant discharged on intensive probation of the progress of such probationer, to make the requirement of periodic drug or alcohol testing applicable to those probationers “on intensive probation”, to provide that a defendant is “placed” rather than “discharged” on intensive probation, and to replace the provision that “Persons may only be placed in the intensive probation program pursuant to an order of a court or judge under section 53a-39” with “Persons may be placed on intensive probation pursuant to an order of a court or judge under section 53a-30 or 53a-39a, or as required by the office of adult probation”; P.A. 02-132 amended Subsec. (a) by deleting provisions re Director of Probation and re appointment and salaries of probation officers and other employees, adding provisions re responsibilities of the executive director of the Court Support Services Division and making technical changes, amended Subsec. (b) by replacing “Director of Probation shall establish within the Office of Adult Probation” with “Judicial Department shall establish within the Court Support Services Division”, deleting provisions re separate operation of program and re sharing of facilities and administrative services, replacing “director” with “executive director of the Court Support Services Division” and replacing “Office of Adult Probation” with “Court Support Services Division”, amended Subsec. (c) by replacing “Director of Probation” with “executive director of the Court Support Services Division”, replacing “Office of Adult Probation” with “Court Support Services Division” and deleting provisions re duties of Director of Probation and amended Subsec. (d) by replacing “Director of Probation” with “executive director of the Court Support Services Division” and replacing “Office of Adult Probation” with “Court Support Services Division”.